Personal reflection on slavery

Parks, a longtime friend of Abraham Lincoln. Browne recalled Abraham Lincoln telling him in I was troubled and grieved over it; but the after the annexation of Texas I gave it up, believing as I now do, that God will settle it, and settle it right, and that he will, in some inscrutable way, restrict the spread of so great an evil; but for the present it is our duty to wait.

Personal reflection on slavery

Reproduction of Emancipation Proclamation at the National Underground Railroad Freedom Center Lincoln's long-term goal was to apply federal pressure on the slave states to get them to abolish slavery on their own, beginning with the four loyal Border States of Maryland, Delaware, Kentucky, and Missouri.

But he also warned that if the slave states seceded from the Union they would forfeit the constitutional protection of slavery, including any claim to the recovery of their fugitive slave.

The American Civil War began in April,and by the end of May the Lincoln administration approved a policy of not returning fugitive slaves who came within Union lines from disloyal states. Such slaves were deemed "contraband of war," or "contrabands.

By the end of the year thousands of slaves were being emancipated. Concerned not to alienate the loyal Border States, Lincoln was careful to ensure that his generals followed the letter of the law.

He encouraged General James K. Lane in western Missouri to emancipate thousands of slaves of disloyal masters who came voluntarily within his lines. But in eastern Missouri, when General John C.

Fremont issued a decree emancipating the slaves of disloyal owners in areas the Union did not control, Lincoln ordered the general to revise his decree to conform with the law. Lincoln promoted Lane to Brigadier General, but would later fire Fremont for corruption and military incompetence. The care Lincoln took to distinguish legal from extra-legal emancipation was reaffirmed in May,when Hunter issued two emancipation proclamations from the area his troops recently occupied off the coast of Georgia.

The first proclamation, which was legal, freed all the slaves who came within his lines. The second proclamation freed all the slaves in free states, most of them beyond the reach of the Union Army.

That second proclamation, like Fremont's, went beyond the law and Lincoln once again reversed it. By the end of tens of thousands of slaves were emancipated as they came into Union lines at Fortress Monroe, Virginia, the Sea Islands off South Carolina, and in western Missouri.

In December the Lincoln administration announced its emancipation policy in a series of annual reports by the president as well as several of his cabinet secretaries. By January Lincoln himself declared that no federal authority, civil or military, could legally return fugitive slaves to their owners.

A few days after Lincoln signed the law--known as the Second Confiscation Act--he drafted the first version of what would become his Emancipation Proclamation. Because the Constitution could sanction emancipation only as one of the war powers, freeing slaves could only be justified as a means of winning the war and suppressing the southern rebellion.

As a result, until the very end of the war Lincoln claimed that the purpose of the war was the restoration of the Union. Southern leaders denounced Lincoln as a bloodthirsty revolutionary whose emancipation policies proved that the secessionists were right all along about those they labeled "Black Republicans.

But Lincoln never deviated from his official position, that because the Constitution recognized slavery in the states the only constitutional justification for freeing slaves was the restoration of the Union. On August 22, Lincoln published a letter in response to an editorial by Horace Greeley of the New York Tribune in which the editor asked why Lincoln had not yet issued an emancipation proclamation, as he was authorized to do by the Second Confiscation Act.

An encyclopedia of philosophy articles written by professional philosophers.

In his reply Lincoln differentiated between "my view of official duty"—that is, what he can do in his official capacity as President—and his personal views. Officially he must save the Union above all else; personally he wanted to free all the slaves: I would save the Union.

I would save it the shortest way under the Constitution. The sooner the national authority can be restored; the nearer the Union will be "the Union as it was. If there be those who would not save the Union unless they could at the same time destroy slavery, I do not agree with them.

My paramount object in this struggle is to save the Union, and is not either to save or to destroy slavery. If I could save the Union without freeing any slave I would do it, and if I could save it by freeing all the slaves I would do it; and if I could save it by freeing some and leaving others alone I would also do that.

What I do about slavery, and the colored race, I do because I believe it helps to save the Union; and what I forbear, I forbear because I do not believe it would help to save the Union. I shall do less whenever I shall believe what I am doing hurts the cause, and I shall do more whenever I shall believe doing more will help the cause.

I shall try to correct errors when shown to be errors; and I shall adopt new views so fast as they shall appear to be true views.

I have here stated my purpose according to my view of official duty; and I intend no modification of my oft-expressed personal wish that all men everywhere could be free.

Personal reflection on slavery

Lincoln scholar Harold Holzer wrote in this context about Lincoln's letter: Therefore, this letter, was in truth, an attempt to position the impending announcement in terms of saving the Union, not freeing slaves as a humanitarian gesture.

It was one of Lincoln's most skillful public relations efforts, even if it has cast longstanding doubt on his sincerity as a liberator.

Rather, Lincoln was softening the strong Northern white supremacist opposition to his imminent emancipation by tying it to the cause of the Union. This opposition would fight for the Union but not to end slavery, so Lincoln gave them the means and motivation to do both, at the same time.

Since slavery was protected by the Constitution, the only way that he could free the slaves was as a tactic of war—not as the mission itself.

Poverty: Not just a state of mind

Late inLincoln asked his Attorney General, Edward Batesfor an opinion as to whether slaves freed through a war-related proclamation of emancipation could be re-enslaved once the war was over.A freedman or freedwoman is a former slave who has been released from slavery, usually by legal caninariojana.comically, slaves were freed either by manumission (granted freedom by their owner) or emancipation (granted freedom as part of a larger group).

A fugitive slave is one who escaped slavery . Slavery and Freedom: An Interpretation of the Old South [James Oakes] on caninariojana.com *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. The most valuable and stimulating general interpretation of the Old South to appear in recent years.

―George M. Fredrickson This pathbreaking interpretation of the slaveholding South begins with the insight that slavery and freedom were not mutually exclusive but were. In the Sixth Sunday of Easter falls on Mother’s Day. Preachers must be aware of this reality, even if they do not choose to make much of it in their sermons and worship planning.

A Windows-based terminal emulator that connects users to IBM, UNIX, Linux, OpenVMS, and HP hosts from their desktops or mobile devices. The struggle over slavery had become a struggle over the way of life for people in the South.

And yet, very few of the 5 million whites in the South were large slave owners: 48, had more than 20 slaves. Oct 10,  · Reflections on Frederick Douglass Posted on October 10, by Ezra Miller Students in English 9 just finished their study .

The Hour has Come -- Lectionary Reflection for Lent 5B