The han and roman attitudes towards technology dbq

The aqueducts don't say anything about the Roman's attitude one way or the other.

The han and roman attitudes towards technology dbq

How to Write a Summary of an Article? New ideas are being introduced, and innovations to current technologies are always taking place. Some may see changes in technology as a vital and helpful thing, while others may oppose.

The han and roman attitudes towards technology dbq

Roman upperclassmen in general had positive attitudes towards technology, as well as innovations in technology. Some higher classmen, however, looked highly upon themselves, and felt like anything not originating from their minds or hands was below them.

Some philosophers had the attitude that anything they did not invent was only mediocre and sufficient, instead of excellent and great. Both authors stated in their documents that anything created by a lower classman was only mediocre in comparison to improvements in technology created by a higher classman like a philosopher.

Therefore, their attitudes toward technology was positive… as long as it was created by a man higher up in society. In Document 7, an upper-class Roman philosopher and adviser to Emperor Nero named Seneca expresses that any tools created by men who are not philosophers are mediocre and insignificant.

His point of view is that he feels that the minds that did create the current technological advances in tools were nimble and sharp, but not great nor elevated.

His attitude towards these breakthroughs in technology are this way because of his role in society. Because philosophers are trained to think this way, they would be able to create tools and new innovations in technology that could completely change how technology was viewed, leading their empires to greater and greater heights.

A Roman political leader named Gaius Gracchus set up a new system of road building, paying equal attention to the functionality and the appearance of the roads. He helped travelers keep track of distance by measuring out every mile and placing a column there. As well as the columns, Gracchus placed large stones on either sides of the road at lesser intervals, so it would be easier for those who road horses to mount them.

Six of the aqueducts flowed into covered containers. Then, the volume was measured by means of calibrated scales. The use of the water was not only used for what was needed, but the water was also utilized for pleasure purposes.

Because they both show the advancements in technology, it is evident that the attitude toward technology was extremely positive. In fact, many government officials often implemented new ideas in their societies.

For example, Tu Shih, who was the governor of Nanyang, invented a water-powered blowing-engine for the casting of iron agricultural implements that allowed people to enjoy great benefit for little labor. Not only has his invention been widely used, but it has also been adopted and innovated by those who use it.

Throughout the years, his invention was cleverly improved in such a way that the ending benefit was increased a hundredfold. There were times, as well, when government officials wrote to local officials describing exactly what needed to be done to assist in current problems.

Though the government officials came up with such an in-depth plan and strategy, the local officials ultimately made the final call, tailoring the governmental plan to fit the individuality of each town.

This proves that the Han Empire had a positive attitude about technology, and were still completely open to the aspects of change and advancements. In Document 3, an upper-class Han philosopher named Huan Tan expresses, with great enthusiasm, his point of view of the evolution of the pestle and the mortar throughout the years.

In the document, it goes in depth describing all of the innovations and advancements the pestle and the mortar have gone through. In Document 3, Huan Tan conveys the story of how Fuxi, who, though mythological, was an emperor, created something, which was improved by regular commoners.

This shows that unlike the Roman philosopher in Document 7, Huan Tan shows no discrimination against the lower classes. He does not feel that in order for truly excellent work, you must have a philosopher title.

He understands that ordinary people can be the most brilliant at times, and finds the entire concept of advancement in technology astounding. An additional document I feel would be beneficial in helping to convey my thesis would be a journal entry from the point of view of a Han Peasant, depicting their attitude towards the new advancements in technology.

This is needed because every document we were given was written from the perspective of an upperclassmen. In order to more accurately answer the question, I feel like we should have an understanding of every socioeconomic class. I also think that in order to more efficiently analyze Document 2, we need a comparison with the journal entry from a Han Peasant.DBQ Debrief: Attitudes Toward Technology in Rome and Han China ES: Demonstrate an understanding of concepts * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Has Acceptable Thesis-1 Core Point Thesis needed to address one specific attitude toward tech.

in Rome and one specific attitude toward tech. in Han China. Should have been essay intro. Attitudes Towards Technology in the Han and Roman Empires DBQ 2 Technology is always changing.

New ideas are being introduced, and innovations to current technologies are always taking place. Some may see changes in technology as a vital and helpful thing, while others may oppose. AP® WORLD HISTORY SCORING GUIDELINES Question 1—Document-Based Question BASIC CORE (competence) 0–7 Points 1.

Has acceptable thesis. 1 Point • The thesis must include both Han and Roman attitudes toward technology with correct qualification of each empire. • The thesis does NOT have to include a comparison of Han and Roman attitudes. How do i write a thesis statement for analyze the Han and Roman attitudes towards technology?.

consider as you prepare to write.

The han and roman attitudes towards technology dbq

As long. Answering the DBQ. How to Write a DBQ. AP World History is an exciting course to take. AP World History. How to Nail the DBQ. The Roman attitude towards technology was that it was it was of little prestige and didn’t relate to the upper classes and was therefore of less importance.

Documents 1, 2, 3, and 4 all have a positive attitude towards technology and that it should be useful to and help the common people. the DBQ question and insightfully includes information from all of the documents.

On if one of my groupings in an essay about Roman and Han technology (from the APWH exam) is “the positive uses of technology”, then my subgroups subgroups when addressing attitudes towards technology as mentioned above.) In summary, do not.

DBQ on differences in Han and Roman attitudes towards technology Essay Example for Free